In case you haven’t noticed, Hollywood’s’
latest villain behind the crime of the century is not some mustache-twirling
rascal, not a bald megalomaniac living in a volcano or a sophisticated thief
out to rob Fort Knox.
Instead, the antagonists in today’s blockbusters masquerade
as exemplary and distinguished role models. While our hero has been pursuing suspect after suspect, the
real engineer behind the inciting incident turns out to be a person considered
beyond reproach - their best friend, superior officer, trusted confidant or
respected colleague.
It’s not a new idea at all. For example, Hitchcock’s “Spellbound”
entertained moviegoers with the case of an amnesiac doctor (Gregory Peck)
suspected of murder. In the last
sequence the esteemed hospital director (Leo G. Carroll) is exposed as the real
murderer. In “Touch of Evil,” director Orson Wells plays an untarnished detective
caught falsifying criminal evidence.
When another officer investigates him, Wells conspires with a gangster
to destroy him. Even Dirty Harry in “Magnum Force” finds incriminating proof
that his Lieutenant is head of a murderous gang of police vigilantes.
Why has this once unorthodox twist become a common fallback solution
for today’s hero/villain dynamic? The answer is obvious - the film industry is
afraid to offend anyone, isolate audience demographics or exclude world markets
that will diminish box office returns.
In the wake of Bernie Madoff’s Ponzi scheme, Edward
Snowden’s defection, and Nixon’s’ Watergate - Hollywood is showing us that we
habitually miscalculate the ones in whom we place our trust. Since we’ve all
been chumped into voting for them, we readily join in their public
vilification.
Would Bond films with a Chinese Communist villain make money
overseas, never mind even be released in China? If Bruce Willis stops a Muslim
terrorist organization then surely the “Die Hard” filmmakers are anti-Muslim.
Marvel Studios aren’t taking any chances. “Captain America:
The First Avenger” didn’t so much battle Nazi Germany in WW2 as he did their
fictional cousins of HYDRA. In the
sequel “Captain America: Winter Soldier”, the descendants of Hydra have
infiltrated government and intelligence organizations at every level to
threaten the free world. Finally, this year’s “Captain America: Civil War” pits
Avenger vs. Avenger in a war of principles. We sense their rivalry will be short-lived, but better to
distract us with colorful hero against hero than by battling real-world threats
like Boko Haram or Al Shabaab.
Similarly framed is Warner Brothers “Batman Vs Superman:
Dawn of Justice.” Our iconic heroes
square off with unbridled fury until they realize the bigger problem is Lex
Luthor.
Is a giant clam swallowing Robin too much to ask for in
today’s market? Adam West would race
to the bat-poles - if he only knew who the bad guy was supposed to be!
The busiest offender of this “good-bad guy” gimmick is the
Bond Franchise, starting with 1995’s “Goldeneye.” Bond’s fights a former agent,
now a mastermind intent on controlling a powerful military satellite. It’s blue-collar
government agent vs. blue-collar evil genius.
“Skyfall” trudges further, with bitter ex-agent Silva seeking
revenge on M for disavowing his existence amidst enemy torture. To justify his motivation, Silva pulls
out his dentures, revealing the Quasimodo-like disfiguration caused by Mi6’s dental
plan.
Donald Pleasance looms as Blofeld in "You Only Live Twice" while Christoph Waltz as Blofeld is lost in "Spectre" |
Gert Frobe as Goldfinger (1965). Nothing like a mint julep after a hard days' laser surgery. |
“Mission Impossible” drinks the same screenwriting kool-aide,
as Tom Cruise outraces more than one government official complicit in heinous activities.
But it’s “Star Trek: Into Darkness” which retreads sacred ground when the Federation’s
Admiral is exposed trying to start an intergalactic war. It wouldn’t be the first time a
Federation official turned bad in Star Trek canon, but when a movie franchise releases
a mega-picture every four years, can we get more face-value villains like the original Khan?
Empathetic villains are great, although not always
necessary. Replace the “twisted secret service agent” out to avenge his
enlisted son’s death by destroying the Presidential Palace in “White House Down”
with a plain, old, rotten Wicked Witch now and then.
Unfortunately for the near future of cinema, real-life terrorists,
rogue nations, dictators, religious extremists, and other vile scourges will be
ignored.
If we must consider the looming threats to peace and harmony,
Hollywood asks that we point to ourselves, gaze into the mirror of the movie
screen and see that our worst threats are not Hitler, Kim Jong Il or ISIS, but
the individuals and groups we trust our welfare to. The baddies have become us.
No comments:
Post a Comment